- Best for
- Teams that want outside SOC capacity without replacing every SIEM and endpoint investment
They cover
- Endpoints
- Cloud Workloads
- Identity & Access
- Network
- SaaS Applications
Your team still owns
- Choosing and licensing the SIEM, EDR, identity, cloud and ticketing tools in scope
- Connecting log sources and validating that critical assets, users and cloud workloads are covered
- Defining which Active Defense actions can run automatically, semi-automatically or only after approval
- Remediating affected systems, users, vulnerabilities and business processes after containment
- Confirming retention, reporting, compliance evidence and termination log-access terms in the order
Pricing
| Line | Figure |
|---|---|
| Published price | Quote-based direct, partner or marketplace private offer |
| Billing model | Custom, Tiered |
| Contract | Not published |
| Onboarding | Not published |
Tradeoffs
Works well
- Flexible model supports Proficio-hosted SIEM, Microsoft Sentinel or Splunk instead of forcing one operating pattern
- Stronger co-managed SOC fit than endpoint-only MDR because Proficio can help with SIEM management, tuning and case workflow
- Active Defense gives a path to approved containment when the buyer is ready for automation
- Public source list shows broad telemetry and response integration coverage across endpoint, identity, cloud and network controls
Watch out for
- Public pricing is quote-based, so buyers need a detailed scope to compare costs
- Containment depends on Active Defense licensing, connected controls, approval rules and change-management constraints
- Public materials mix MDR, XDR, endpoint, Microsoft, Splunk and add-on services, which can make scope comparison harder
- G2 and Reddit have limited public review depth compared with larger MDR brands
What buyers say
Alert noise
Not assessed
Transparency
Not assessed
Customers like
- Gartner review excerpts mention 24/7 monitoring, timely communication and monthly service calls
- Public reviews point to flexibility across EDR platforms and existing tools
- Proficio customer quotes emphasize lower false-positive workload and 24/7 monitoring support
Watch out for
- G2 has only one visible review and explicitly lacks enough buying insight
- Gartner excerpts include cautions about dashboard/reporting depth and detection coverage confidence
- Reddit discussion is thin, with some practitioners less familiar with Proficio than larger MDR names
Reputation reads from public reviews, not vendor-published numbers.
Ask before buying
- Are we buying hosted ProSOC MDR, the Microsoft Sentinel service, the Splunk service, endpoint MDR or a bundle?
- Which containment actions can Proficio execute in our tools, and how are they aligned with change management?
- How are fees calculated for log sources, service units, EDR management, Active Defense and renewal changes?
Integrations
Editorial notes
Why co-managed SOC
Proficio does more than monitor and notify: it operates 24/7 SOC workflows, investigates alerts, manages SIEM content, handles cases and can run containment through Active Defense. The buyer still owns the environment, approvals and remediation, so co-managed SOC is a better primary lane than full SOC.
Response boundary
Base ProSOC MDR material emphasizes investigation, actionable alerts and guided remediation. Automated or semi-automated containment is tied to Active Defense and supported integrations, so buyers should not assume every quote includes under-four-minute containment across every tool.
Platform boundary
Proficio can bring a hosted SIEM or operate around customer-owned Microsoft Sentinel or Splunk. This profile is scoped to ProSOC MDR and its named variants, not every Proficio professional-service, exposure-management or breach-simulation offer.
Pricing boundary
No current numeric list price was found. AWS Marketplace uses private offers, and Proficio's service terms point to order-specific scope, quantities and fees, so this profile avoids invented monthly ranges.
Compliance boundary
Proficio publishes SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 certifications and describes MDR support for HIPAA, PCI DSS, NIST, GDPR, FFIEC and NERC CIP needs. Treat these as provider controls and compliance-assistance signals, not proof that a buyer's environment is automatically compliant.