Use it when
Use this list when you know the service label, but still need to compare the operational scope behind it.
Service type
Providers listing Co-Managed SOC. Compare monitoring scope, response ownership, and what your team still owns.
Binary Defense engineers and analysts help operate customer-owned SIEM, XDR and endpoint tools with 24/7 monitoring, detection tuning, alert triage, investigation, threat hunting context and response guidance.
Mid-Market / Enterprise · Endpoints
24/7 MDR and co-managed SOC support with alert triage, investigation, detection content, threat intelligence, approved response actions, portal visibility and Microsoft or Splunk operating support
Mid-Market / Enterprise · Endpoints
Hybrid or fully outsourced SOC operation with 24/7 monitoring, alert investigation, threat hunting, threat intelligence, SIEM and SOAR enhancement, incident response leadership and detection improvement across agreed environments.
Mid-Market / Enterprise · Endpoints
24/7 MDR with analyst investigation, AI-assisted correlation, identity and asset context through Meridian, customer-specific detection and response paths, optional tool management and approved containment actions.
Mid-Market / Enterprise · Endpoints
24/7 SOC monitoring of the buyer's Darktrace environment, alert triage, investigations, containment-action escalation, analyst questions, monthly service reports, service-ready checks and optimization reviews.
Mid-Market / Enterprise · Network
24/7 co-managed MDR with alert validation, investigation, threat hunting, detection engineering, response workflow support, named experts and a shared Security Center layered over supported buyer tools.
Mid-Market / Enterprise · Endpoints
Co-managed Open XDR with managed SIEM, 24/7 SOC monitoring, workflow automation, threat hunting, log retention, compliance reporting and package-dependent endpoint, vulnerability and incident-support options.
SMB / Mid-Market · Endpoints
24/7 Microsoft-focused MXDR with ION automation, Sentinel and Defender operations, Cyber Defender investigation, threat hunting, Teams collaboration and Cyber Advisor posture work
Mid-Market / Enterprise · Endpoints
24/7 SOC monitoring, analyst investigation, hosted or customer-owned SIEM operations, threat hunting, case management, guided remediation and optional Active Defense containment across supported tools.
Mid-Market / Enterprise · Endpoints
GreyMatter connects to enterprise security tools, normalizes alerts, supports investigation and hunting, runs approved response playbooks and gives the buyer a shared operating surface with ReliaQuest analysts and engineers.
Enterprise / Mid-Market · Endpoints
24/7 MXDR over Todyl's managed SIEM and security stack, with transparent cases, live analyst access and a dedicated DRAM
MSP/MSSP / SMB · Endpoints
Use this list when you know the service label, but still need to compare the operational scope behind it.
The label is not enough. Two providers can both sell MDR while handling alert triage, containment, tooling, and reporting very differently.
The co-managed SOC model addresses a common reality in cybersecurity: many organizations have some internal security capability but not enough to achieve true 24/7 operations. Co-managed SOC providers partner with your existing security team, filling specific gaps — whether that is off-hours monitoring, specialized threat hunting, or overflow capacity during incidents — while leaving your team in control of the overall security program.
In a co-managed arrangement, responsibilities are explicitly divided between your internal team and the provider. A typical split might have the provider handling 24/7 alert monitoring and initial triage, while your team handles escalated investigations, response decisions, and remediation. The specific division varies by provider and is usually customized during onboarding based on your team’s strengths and gaps.
The primary advantage of co-managed SOC is that it preserves institutional knowledge and internal control while solving the coverage and capacity problem. Your team retains deep familiarity with your environment and business context, and the provider contributes scale, off-hours coverage, and specialized expertise. This model also tends to be more cost-effective than full outsourcing, since you are supplementing rather than replacing your team.
Successful co-managed SOC engagements depend heavily on communication, tooling interoperability, and clear escalation workflows. Evaluate providers on how well their platform integrates with your existing tools, the clarity of their shared responsibility model, and their willingness to adapt their processes to your team’s workflows rather than forcing you into a rigid framework.