Who does what
Provider
- Automated enrichment and cross-tool investigation
- Verdicts, reports and suggested next steps
Your team
- Analyst validation and response execution
- Detection sources, access and organizational context
Coverage
- Endpoints
- Cloud Workloads
- Identity & Access
- Network
Details
Service scope
Best for Enterprise SOCs and MSSPs that want investigation capacity while keeping response decisions in their existing team.
Enrich
Pulls evidence from connected sources.
Investigate
Produces a verdict and recommended next steps.
Act
Your analysts validate and trigger remediation.
Full service analysis
Automated investigations with remediation left to analysts
- Your team owns
- Maintain alerting and the tools queried for evidence.
- Provide tenant-specific policies and business context.
- Validate escalations and execute containment and remediation.
Response boundary
Qevlar's lifecycle and responsibility FAQ says analysts validate findings and trigger remediation. A separate adoption paragraph mentions permitting containment actions. This profile covers investigation with buyer-led response. Confirm any additional actions, connectors and permissions in the order.
Pricing & contract
- Billing
- Custom
Obtain a quote that defines investigation volume, tenant allowance, integrations and SaaS or private-cloud deployment. Existing detection tools and response systems still need their own licensing and operators.
Tradeoffs & buying questions
Strengths
-
Fits existing ticket workflows
Investigations can fit the ticket workflow analysts already use.
-
Private-cloud deployment option
Deployment offers a private-cloud option.
Considerations
-
Response stays with analysts
Analysts remain responsible for validating and executing response.
-
Commercial scope needs a quote
The commercial units and deployment terms require a quote.
Ask before buying
- Which exact sources can Qevlar query in your environment and what permissions are required?
- How are client-specific context, corrections and exceptions maintained across tenants?
- Which response actions, if any, does Qevlar execute directly, and where are permissions, approvals and action records kept?
Integrations
Platform / SIEM
- Microsoft Sentinel
Endpoint
- CrowdStrike
- Microsoft Defender
Other integrations
- Microsoft Entra ID
- Microsoft Exchange
Common questions
Does Qevlar replace the team's SOAR?
Qevlar describes investigation alongside an existing SOAR. That SOAR can continue ticketing, closure and response execution while Qevlar provides the investigation.
Can the team keep its existing case interface?
The product supports headless operation connected to a ticketing system as an alternative to its own platform interface. Confirm field mapping and updates during evaluation.